Why wasn't more stuff produced ?
Well,he also says in that opening statement that he was keen to avoid "any kind of excess" with regard to the Paddington spin-offs.So I can only assume that when it came to The Herbs he was maybe slightly too cautious in who he gave licensing deals to -either that or he fixed the prices too high.Because,despite what he goes on to say,it's really hard to imagine any manufacturer turning away a big hit series.......so long as the price was right.
And claiming that it'd "been written for an audience which didn't have any great buying power" is also rather odd.
Because,at the risk shocking younger readers,I can assure you that "pester-power" was very much alive and well in 1968.And a hit show also attracted far larger ratings than today simply because there were so few channels.So I'm not sure there can really be too many excuses with such a large captive audience.
Was the stuff produced any good ?
Personally,I think the quality and range of product reflect well on both him and the series.Although how much of that was by design is anyone's guess.Because we can only really guage how much quality control he applied by finding out about the deals he turned down -assuming there were any.
But,ask yourself this.......
If it was your pet project,your "baby"........Would a crude plastic likeness in a Rice Krispies packet ever be a step too far if you had a mortgage to pay ?
Unlikely.
But how about if your mortgage and pension were sorted,and the deals still kept coming ?
Would you ever feel precious enough about it to say "no" to anyone ? Or would it always just be a money-making exercise ?
Lord knows. Each to their own I suppose. Although it's a dilemna most of us wouldn't mind facing at some point !